The test also included violation of consent in which participation of the children was made involuntarily. The first day of the experiment she convinced the children that blue-eyed people were smarter, better and would have more priorities. There is a way to avoid editing or writing from scratch! More than 50 years after her famous exercise, Elliott is still fighting. The first thing that Jane Elliott did was divide the children into groups: those with blue eyes and those with brown eyes. Then a picture was taken to remember. They were also relevant in the 1950s when Elliott first began this work. . Order from one of our vetted writers instead, First name should have at least 2 letters, Phone number should have at least 10 digits, Free Essay with a Response to Cross Words by UIW President Louis Agnese, How Does Donald Duk View His Chinese Heritage? A columnist at a Denver newspaper called it "evil. The empathy she works to inspire in students with the experiment, which has been modified over the years, is necessary, she said. All rights reserved. "Do blue-eyed people remember what they've been taught?" On the first day, she told the children with blue eyes they were superior: smarter and more well-behaved than the children with brown eyes. The second day, Elliott reversed the groups. If this arbitrary division that Elliott enforced for a few hours created so many problems in this classroom, whats happening on a larger scale? She was 10 before the farmhouse had running water and electricity. If you had a good German name, but you had brown eyes, they threw you into the gas chamber because they thought you might be a Jewish person who was trying to pass. ", A former teacher, Ruth Setka, 79, said she was perhaps the only teacher who would still talk to Elliott. One caller complained that white children would not be able to handle . ", Jane shielded her eyes from the morning sun. Kors writes that Elliott's exercise taught "blood-guilt and self-contempt to whites," adding that "in her view, nothing has changed in America since the collapse of Reconstruction." Blue Eyed versus Brown Eyed Students Jane Elliott was not a psychologist, but she developed one of the most famously controversial exercises in 1968 by dividing students into a blue-eyed group and . Abstract The effectiveness of a well-known prejudice-reduction simulation, "Blue Eyes-Brown Eyes," was assessed as a tool for changing the attitudes of ncnblack teacher eduction students toward blacks. One student answers, since the day I was born. Throughout the entire experiment, Elliott leads frank conversations about race and discrimination. One key assumption is that the sample population represents an actual society. All 28 children found their desks, and Elliott said she had something special for them to do, to begin to understand the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. the day before. "She was an excellent school teacher, but she has a way about her," says 90-year-old Riceville native Patricia Bodenham, who has known Elliott since Jane was a baby. The demonstration has since been taught by generations of teachers to millions of kids across the country. The Blue-Eyed/Brown-Eyed Experiment: Investigation. Elliott asked. At first, she cooperated with me. Its not surprising to anyone that some social groups discriminate against others due to ethnicity, religion, or culture. "That you, Ms. Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER! Jane Elliott's Blue-Eyed versus Brown-Eyed Students experiment was conducted to determine whether racism was a learned characteristic. (In later versions of the exercise, children in the inferior group were given collars to wear.). In the 60s, the United States was in the midst of a social race crisis. In response to the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. in 1968, Jane Elliott devised the controversial and startling, "Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes Exercise." This, now famous, exercise labels participants as inferior or superior based solely upon the color of their eyes and exposes them to the experience of . Jane Elliot's experiment explains the reasons for discrimination to a small extent. Jane Elliott has done a lot of reflection about the consequences of the minimal group experiment. She also assumed that none of the children had interacted with black people and that the only place they could have seen them is on television. To most people, it seemed to suggest that racism could be reduced, even eliminated, by a one- or two-day exercise. Outside, rows of corn stretched to the horizon. The experiment is to help the children to understand about prejudice and discrimination. But the protests happening now have given her hope. She wanted them to understand what discrimination felt like. The video . And our number two freedom is the freedom to deny that were ignorant., I want every white person in this room who would be happy to be treated as this society in general treats our citizens, our black citizens, if you, as a white person, would be happy to receive the same treatment that our black citizens do in this society, please stand. While Jane Elliot's experiment makes several assumptions, it also has some ethical concerns. January 1, 2003. "Maybe the way to sell the exercise would have been to invite the parents in, to talk about what she'd be doing. Elliott was featured on nearly every national news show in America for decades. You give them something nice and they just wreck it." "She taught in this school for 18 years." The American Psychologists Principles and code of conduct state that in cases of deception, experimenters should take into consideration the potential harmful effects to participants. Part of the problem is that the blue-eyed group is exclusively white, while the brown-eyed group is predominantly non-white, so that eye colour is no longer an analogue or metaphor for race but a . Kids on top would tease the children who were deemed as the inferior group. She then made the blue-eyed students believe that they were better and smarter than their counterparts. Barbie had to have a Ken, so Elliott picked from the audience a tall, handsome man and accused him of doing the same things with his female subordinates, Pasicznyk said. She also made the brown-eyed students put construction paper armbands on the blue-eyed students. The ethical concerns arising from the experiment are consent and deception. Blue-eyed people. From the moment the experiment begins, Jane Elliott uses a mean tone to speak to the participants. Elliot's approach to the experiment involved creativity in which the pupils' age and ability to comprehend discrimination was taken into account. One caller complained that white children would not be able to handle the exercise and would be seriously damaged by the exercise. Alan Charles Kors, a professor of history at the University of Pennsylvania, says Elliott's diversity training is "Orwellian" and singled her out as "the Torquemada of thought reform." Elliott instructed the blue-eyed kids not to play on the jungle gym or swings. From Elliot's highly controversial experiment it is clear that prejudice and discrimination can only be understood through experience. Open Document. She also made the brown-eyed students put construction paper armbands on the blue-eyed students. She attended a oneroom rural schoolhouse.Today, at 72, Elliott, who has short white hair, a penetrating gaze and no-nonsense demeanor, shows no signs of slowing. The experiment, known as Blue Eyes Brown Eyes experiment, is regarded as an eye-opening way for children to learn about racism and discrimination. She told them brown-eyed . Blue Eyed vs Brown Eyed Study Conducted by Jane Elliott Presentation by Bree Elliott Ethics Background The Results In 1968, when Dr. Martin Luther King Junior was assassinated, Jane Elliott was the teacher of a third grade class in the town of Riceville, Iowa. Fourteen years later, the students featured in The Eye of the Storm reunited and discussed their experiences with Elliott. However, both Mary and Zeke have brown eyes. Elliott was even brought on The Tonight Show to talk about her experiences. The more melanin, the darker the person's eyesand the smarter the person. They killed hundreds of thousands of people based on eye color alone, thats the reason I used eye color for my determining factor that day., Elliott divided the class into children with blue eyes and children with brown eyes. She had never met me, and she accused me in front of everyone of using my sexuality to get ahead.. "I understand this is the first time you've flown?" Elliott turned into Americas mother of diversity training. She and her husband, Darald Elliott, then a grocer, have four children, and they, too, felt a backlash. [White people] on the other hand, don't have to understand them. In 1970, Elliott would come to national attention when ABC broadcast their Eye of the Storm documentary which filmed the experiment in action. Professor of Journalism, University of Iowa. Mental Sandboxes and Their Usefulness in Today's World, The Law of Reversed Effort: When Taking Action Isn't the Best Option. The next day, Jane made it known to the students that she had made a mistake and that the brown-eyed pupils were better and smarter than their counterparts. The episode features with new footage of the students, who are now adults. (2010). That's not true. "People of other color groups seem to understand," she said. Disclaimer: SpeedyPaper.com is a custom writing service that provides online on-demand writing work for assistance purposes. one girl asked. She asks them if they have ever faced treatment like the type that blue-eyed people would experience in the following two and a half hours. ", "I've never forgotten the exercise," Whisenhunt volunteered. She told them that people with brown eyes were superior to those with blue eyes, for reasons she made up. If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the After the exercise white college students in . (She prefers the term "exercise.") Retrieved from https://speedypaper.com/essays/ethical-concerns-in-jane-elliots-experiment, Free essays can be submitted by anyone, so we do not vouch for their quality. Not everyone appreciated Elliotts exercise. Subsequently the brown-eyed children stopped objecting, even when Miss Elliott and the blue-eyed kids chastised and bullied them. Theyd have to use paper cups if they drank from the water fountain. To this day, at the age of 86, Jane Elliott continues this work. Elliott shared the essays with her mother, who showed them to the editor of the weekly Riceville Recorder. The blue-eyed students, when told they were superior and offered privileges such as extra recess time, changed their behavior dramatically and their attitudes toward the children with brown eyes. Stripping away the veneer of the experiment, what was left had nothing to do with race. Later, it would occur to Elliott that the blueys were much less nasty than the brown-eyed kids had been, perhaps because the blue-eyed kids had felt the sting of being ostracized and didn't want to inflict it on their former tormentors. Jane Elliott, shown here in 2009, remains an outspoken advocate against racism. Proceeding with the experiment, Elliot divided the children into two groups each with nine pupils. This was the smaller group. In the brown eyed/blue eyed experiment Jane Elliot told her third graders with blue eyes that they were better than the brown-eyed children. She says its because racism, sexism, homophobia, ageism, and ethnocentrism are mean and nasty. Students in the inferior groups were more likely to get a worse score. In Building Moral Intelligence: The Seven Essential Virtues That Teach Kids to Do the Right Things, educational psychologist Michele Borda says it "teaches our children to counter stereotypes before they become full-fledged, lasting prejudices and to recognize that every human being has the right to be treated with respect." Researchers later concluded that there was evidence that the students became less prejudiced after the study and that it was inconclusive as to whether or not the potential harm outweighed the benefits of the exercise. The results showed a . The killing of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, was a seismic event, a turning point that compelled many Americans to do something and do it with urgency. There are risks to those inoculations, too, but we determine that those risks are worth taking. In a grassy front yard down the block is a hand-lettered sign: "Glads for Sale, 3 for $1." Typical of their responses was that of Debbie Hughes, who reported that "the people in Mrs. Elliott's room who had brown eyes got to discriminate against the people who had blue eyes. It also documents small-town White America's reflex reaction to the . ", Elliott says the role of a teacher is to enhance students' moral development. She repeated the abuse with subsequent classes, and finally turned it into a fully commercial enterprise. View Module 2 Discussion_ Are We Still Divided_ Blue Eyes_Brown Eyes_ A 3rd Grade Lesson for Us All.pdf from HUMN 330 at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Therefore when she gave the blue eyed people more freedom than the brown eyed people, the blue eyed people started feeling like kings because they thought they were better, and were treated better. Thats just the way blue-eyed kids were, Elliott told the students. Or alternatively you may decide to keep them in ignorance of what is happening. Almost immediately, it was apparent that she had created segregation and prejudice given that the blue-eyed students began exhibiting signs of dominion and superiority. At the time, she was a third-grade . On April 4 1968, King was killed by the single . This procedure is sometimes so subtle that no one notices it happening. She asked her students, who were all white, whether or not they knew what it felt like to be judged by the color of their skin. As Elliott recalls, she engineered the "blue eyes/brown eyes exercise" in 1968 after watching the late-night news cycle announce the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. Rather than be deterred by possible The latter felt discriminated against by the other brown-eyed children. You didnt understand the directions. Grasping for a scientific explanation, she ended up claiming that melanin makes eyes darker, and makes . "No person of any age [was] going to leave my presence with those attitudes unchallenged," Elliott said. Why was the Blue Eyes and Brown Eyes Experiment considered unethical in psychology? Two years later, a BBC documentary captured the experiment in Elliott's classroom. ABC broadcast a documentary about her work. One scholar asserts that it is "Orwellian" and teaches whites "self-contempt." It is quite powerful to watch. In 1968 after Martin Luther King was assassinated the United States was in turmoil. Directed by William Peters, the episode profiles the Iowa schoolteacher Jane Elliott and her class of third graders, who took part in a class exercise about discrimination and prejudice in 1970 and reunited in the present day to recall the experience. She gave the blue-eyed students an armband so other students could more easily identify them, and then she told her class that it was a scientific fact that people with brown eyes are smarter than those with blue because their bodies had more . Despite the adaptation of the experiment in psychological studies, Jane has been widely criticized for her unethical conduct and promotion of discrimination among children. "It would be hard to know, wouldn't it, unless we actually experienced discrimination ourselves. How do you think the world would change if everyone experienced the perils and setbacks that come with prejudice and discrimination? Jane Elliott, Creator of the "Blue/Brown Eyes" Experiment, Says Racism Is Easy To Fix. "Things are changing, and they're going to change rapidly if we're very, very fortunate," she said. Elliott is nothing if not stubborn. people are better than blue-eyed people. Jane Elliott, an educator and anti-racism activist, first conducted her blue eyes/brown eyes exercise in her third-grade classroom in Iowa in 1968. Written and verified by the psychologist Francisco Roballo. Regardless of age, gender, race, ethnicity or socioeconomic status, decision making in psychology should protect individual rights and welfare to eliminate potential biases. ISBN 9780520382268. The brown-eyed children could take off their armbands and give them to the blue-eyed children, who were now taught that they were inferior to the brown-eyed children. Jane Elliott's brown eye/blue eye experiment starts at 03:10 of A Class Divided. As a journalism professor and author of a book on race that spans more than 50 years, Ive watched these developments with great concern. Then tell them that . Yes, that day was tough. Ethical issues were 1/3 of the participants refused to take the head off the rat . The blue eyes and brown eyes experiment According to supporters of Elliott's approach, the goal is to reach people's sense of empathy and morality. Blue Eyes vs. Brown Eyes Experiment. According to the article is Jane Elliot's experiment to small degree effective.
What Happened To Eli Gold, Are Gobstoppers Discontinued, Advantages And Disadvantages Of Medical Technology, Most Fun Titan Quest Builds, Benefits Of Kahoot For Students, Articles B